Taking Tamoxifen or using birth control drugs can increase risk of triple negative breast cancer 4-fold
May 6, 2010
Manchester by the Sea, MA
A woman’s risk of developing aggressive triple negative breast cancer seems to increase 4- fold for individuals who are either taking birth control drugs or are taking the breast cancer drug, Tamoxifen.
Both pieces of research out of the Seattle- based Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and published in different scientific journals in 2009, include important facts for women who are currently using either of these drugs, or considering the use of either drug.
Unfortunately neither the American Cancer Society, nor Susan G. Komen for the Cure have yet to mention either of these recent and alarming studies on their websites as of May 7, 2010.
WHY??
If the American Cancer Society is considered by many to be our unofficial national cancer prevention organization ; if Susan G Komen is considered to be our leading national non profit on breast cancer education, why isn’t either group sounding an alarm about using birth control drugs or using Tamoxifen?
A possible answer: Pharmaceutical companies that make billions from contraceptive drugs and billions from the sale of Tamoxifen, also give hundreds of millions to the American Cancer Society and to Komen each year. Perhaps, these non-profits are unwilling to bite the hands that feed them.
Meanwhile, American women are left vulnerable for developing triple negative breast cancer as this fast growing type of breast disease is now rapidly increasing across the United States.
Triple Negative now represents 15% to 20% of all new invasive breast cancer diagnoses, striking younger women more often than older women and striking a disproportionate number of younger black women compared to white women.
Research studies cited in today’s post:
Jennifer Dolle, et al, Risk Factors for Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Women Under the Age of 45 Years , Cancer, Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 2009; 18 (4) April 2009.
The only way to access a free copy of this complete report on line is through the following anti-abortion link:
http://www.jillstanek.com/Abortion%20Breast%20Cancer%20Epid%Bio%20Prev%202009.pdf
Christopher Li, MD PhD, Long-term tamoxifen use increases the risk of an aggressive, difficult to treat type of second breast cancer, Cancer Research, August 25, 2009,
http://www.fhcrc.org/about/ne/news/2009/08/25/tamoxifen.html
Breast Cancer survivor credits vitamin D for recovery
Listen to your doctor and also take enough vitamin D to get your blood serum levels up to 60-80 ng/ml is the word out of Toronto for Rhonda Abrams, diagnosed with stage IV invasive breast cancer five years ago.
Given two years to survive, in spite of following the medical protocol, Abrams read the new research on how enough Vitamin D3 can prevent tumor formation.
She took her life in her own hands and began supplementing her diet with enough daily Vitamin D3 to raise her blood levels to the magical 60-80ng/ml. Today her breast cancer remains in remission.
Read about how Vitamin D3 can help protect you from developing breast cancer ever or never again at www.knowbreastcancer.net
And remember that the breast cancer detection and treatment industy (oncology centers, “breast health” centers and drug companies) is not interested in teaching women how to avoid an initial breast cancer diagnosis.
Prevention is not their business; prevention is not their job.
But prevention is your business and my business. We can learn how to take care of our own health. Learn more at www.knowbreastcancer.net
Read Rhonda Abrams’ amazing story in the Toronto Star at www.knowbreastcancer.net
or at
Birth Control Pills Now Linked to Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Recent research out of Seattle shows a disturbingly strong link between young women (40 years and younger) who used oral contraceptives and their tendency to develop triple negative breast cancer, a rapidly growing estrogen-negative type of the disease.
Among women (40 years and younger) the relative risk for triple-negative breast cancer associated with oral contraceptive use (of more than one year ) was 4.2. (95%confidence interval, 1.9-9.3)
This study, Risk Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Women Under the Age of 45 Years, involving over 1,000 women, led by Jessica M. Dolle, at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and published in the academic journal, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention in April of last year, did not find a similar link between other kinds of breast cancer and the use of oral contraceptives in this same group of breast cancer patients.
( one page abstract/summary of study)
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/18/4/1157.abstract
( full study: ten page PDF)
http://www.jillstanek.com/Abortion%20Breast%20Cancer%20Epid%20Bio%20Prev%202009.pdf
Most types of breast cancer seem to be caused by a cocktail of various ingredients that appear to be unique to each person, that mixed together can create a perfect toxic storm.
Triple Negative breast cancer strikes younger women more often than older women, and strikes black women at double the rate of white women. Younger black women are currently the most at- risk population for developing this type of breast cancer.
Sadly 90+% of the dollars earmarked for triple negative breast cancer research, by Susan G Komen for the Cure, by the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, by government and other private grant makers are only focused on developing expensive drugs that can “find a cure” for this disease.
Last week a recent market research report predicted that by 2018 a new breast cancer drug, BSI-201 will enjoy $1.7 billion in worldwide sales, with special potential for the triple negative market.
www.drugstorenews.com/story.aspx?id=131607&menuid=345
For women fighting this disease, this is wonderful news as such drugs can be critical. But we also need to figure out how to stop triple negative breast cancer before it starts... even if there is no $1.7 billion drug at the end of the rainbow.
Audre Lorde, poet, lesbian, feminist leader, African American and author of The Cancer Journals, who died in 1992 after a fourteen-year struggle with breast cancer, was one of the first to notice society’s interest in profit making, rather than in trying to stop breast cancer before it starts.
…what would happen if an army of one-breasted women descended upon Congress and demanded that the use of carcinogenic, fat-stored hormones in beef-feed be outlawed?
Each year, about 30,000 women in the U.S. are now being diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer and this number continues to grow. Most of these women are younger than 40 and more than 15% of these young women are black.
We need to ask foundations and government agencies to fund Jessica Dolle and other cancer prevention researchers as they try to understand more about what chemicals, foods and drugs are causing all of this triple negative.
Meanwhile, do not expect your birth control pack to mention Dolle’s recent research linking birth control drugs to triple negative breast cancer; in fact do not expect the American Cancer Society or even most major breast cancer foundations to breathe a word of Dolle’s 2009 study.
Birth control pills and breast cancer drugs are both multi-billion dollar a year markets. The pharmaceutical companies that sell these drugs also give many millions of dollars each year to the American Cancer Society, Komen and other. Few organizations, I suppose, want to bite the hands that feed them.
From a practical, personal point of view, younger women who want to continue using birth control pills should counterbalance their risk of developing triple negative by getting a Vitamin D3 blood test.. and taking 2,000 IUs or more of Vitamin D3 supplements every day until your blood test shows you have a level of 60-80 ng/ml of vitamin D3. New research shows that this level of vitamin D3 should protect a huge majority of all women against developing all types of breast cancer.
For more ideas on how to help lower your risk of developing any type of breast cancer, at any age, see Know Breast Cancer’s 7 Easy Ways at www.knowbreastcancer.net
Thermography: safer, more accurate than mammograms
February 13. 2010
I recently had a full body European thermogram instead of a screening mammogram. Happily, I learned that I have no tumors in my breasts, nor do I have any inflammation there, which can be an early warning sign for future atypical cells (DCIS) or various types of actual breast cancer.
The thermogram took place in the practitioner’s office, where she had me wear a long sleeved button-down- the- front shirt with no bra and had me strip to my underpants.
She then touched her electromagnetic wand to various points on my body… from head to pelvis, while the computer compiled the temperature of each point.
The worse part was having to stand fairly naked for ten minutes while my body cooled down! The practitioner again passed the wand over those same body points, as the computer took a second reading of my now cooled- off body. BRRR!!!!
Five minutes later, the computer printed off a diagram, along with an analysis of my body’s cool and hot spots!
I recently learned that there are two types of thermography, both types being safer and more accurate than screening mammograms.
The full- body European type, that I experienced, uses electromagnetic pulses, while the more common type of thermogram uses thermal imaging.
The European type offers a functional assessment of the nervous system and is more readily accepted by medical insurance companies. But both types of thermograms are usually done on the entire body, as the breasts are integrally linked to the rest of your body! duh!!
For example, if your left breast shows inflammation, but not your right breast, your full body thermogram might show a core of inflammation in your left shoulder that radiates over to your left breast; Hence as in everything in life.. it is always important to get the full picture, so you can locate the actual source of a problem.
Two clinics that offer European Thermography (also called computer regulated thermography ) in New England are : Jackie Bell Natural Health in Cambridge, MA www.naturalbell.com and Sojourns Community Health Clinic in Westminster, VT www.sojourns.org
As more and more women use some type of thermography, instead of choosing to have an annual or biannual mammogram, I predict that breast health clinics and medical centers will complain or shout that “mammograms are safer” … until these same clinics decided to switch over to thermography as well!
But right now, many breast health clinics and medical centers need to pay off the cost of their new digital mammography machines , so there will probably continue to be huge marketing pressure put on women of various ages to have an annual screening mammogram rather than a thermogram.
For those of us who like to think for ourselves, and limit the amount of radiation that touches any part of our bodies, it is nice that some of us now have the thermography option.
Dr Mercola, America’s #1 on-line natural health MD, agrees that thermograms are safer and better than mammograms. Check out this link to his video on thermography and vitamin D3 for breast cancer prevention)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyRAR2K_ZfQ&feature=player_embedded
Choosing thermography over a screeing mammogram is one of Know B rest Cancer’s 7 Easy Ways to help stop breast cancer from happening to you. To learn about all 7 Easy Ways, please visit www.knowbreastcancer.net
Thinking of Sara Palin and Breast Health Centers…or..”Why our hospitals don’t talk about real or natural breast cancer prevention
January 5, 2010
Manchester by the Sea, MA
Our local Breast ” Health” Centers, located in medical centers, community hospitals and free-standing clinics around the U.S., currently do next to nothing about educating women on how to keep our breasts naturally healthy.
You can put lipstick on a pig, but as Sara says, “It’s still a pig.”
Breast “Health” Centers are currently breast cancer diagnostic centers; places where women are given screening x-rays and possibly more diagnostic x-rays in the form of mammograms or MRIs with toxic dyes, along with needle aspirations, and lumpectomies.
But real breast health is something different. Now that we know so much more about how breast cancer begins or grows; now that we know so much more about how to actually limit the number of women who ever develop breast cancer; it’s time for medical centers to also set up real Breast Health Centers or real Breast Cancer Prevention Centers.
Real or natural breast cancer prevention is no longer rocket science; getting the word out to women seems to be a more difficult task.
Here is a sampling of what real Breast Health Centers could offer women today:
- A blood test to determine your vitamin D3 levels with info sessions on how much vitamin D3 and calcium supplements you should be taking every day to gradually reach the new recommended level of 60-80 ng/ml of vitamin D3 in your blood serum levels.
For more info on how 60-89 ng/ml of vitamin D3 can amazingly block the first stage of breast cancer development, go to Easy Way #1 at www.knowbreastcancer.net
- Individualized birth control counseling for women over 40, to help you switch off of birth control pills, patches, rings and estrogen-based IUDs. Women in their 40’s, who still use these drugs, significantly raise their risk of developing aggressive estrogen negative breast cancers.
To see some of the research showing that contraceptive drugs are considered unsafe for women over 40 years of age, go to Easy Way #3 at www.knowbreastcancer.net
- Cooking classes for women who want to include dairy-free recipes and other breast cancer-protecting foods, such as Japanese miso and fermented black beans in their families’ daily meals. The Japanese and Chinese, with their dairy-free diets and numerous fermented soy dishes, have one third the breast cancer rates of North American and Northern European women!
For more info on how organic fermented soy foods can be more effective and safer than taking Tamoxifen or Arimidex, see Easy Way #6 at www.knowbreastcancer.net
- Education groups for women who want to put less alcohol, less nicotine and less sugar into their bodies each day. This is obviously not an easy task, but offering such support under the label of breast cancer prevention, will take some of the stigma out of treating these dangerous lifestyles. Using one or more of these toxins every day can triple a woman’s risk level if trying to avoid a second breast cancer diagnosis. Carrying twenty extra pounds of fat can double any older woman’s risk of developing invasive breast cancer. Also heavy drinking and/or any level of smoking appear to cancel out any protection offered from Vitamin D3 supplementation.
For the latest research on alcohol, smoking, excess body fat and increased breast cancer risk levels, go to Easy Way #7 at www.knowbreastcancer.net
This is all pretty sobering, exciting and hopeful info, but sadly don’t expect our local medical centers to open up any real Breast Health Centers any day soon.
Why not??!
A real or natural Breast Health Center is a low-tech, low-profit service, geared to decreasing the number of community women who will ever develop breast cancer. For these two reasons alone, medical centers do not believe it is in their financial self interest to create such centers.
Remember… most non-profit and for-profit medical centers and clinics operate as for-profit corporations. Executives are often paid a six or seven figure income when they are able to snuff out competing medical centers, recruit more cancer patients, and continue to offer highly profitable medical services to these individuals until they die.
Until we have a health care system that is detached from any profit motives (such as your local fire department is) where people’s health (your burning home) comes before corporate profits, medical centers will never be interested in sponsoring real breast health centers.
note: If you appreciate reading the opinions and research- based information shared in these blog postings and at www.knowbreastcancer.net we need to ask each of you to help support our work with a tax-deductible contribution.
Please at least send us $7 (for our 7 Easy Ways) and ask 7 of your friends to do the same. We, of course, would also appreciate your sending larger contributions as well. Just go to www.knowbreastcancer.net and click on the “contribute” link.
Together, one woman at a time, we can stop this unnecessary epidemic.
Thanks so much,
Susan
Please give Know Breast Cancer a tax deductible contribution today.
$7 for our 7 Easy Ways
Disagreeing with Teresa Heinz Kerry over mammograms for all
Dec 23, 2009
The number of women in the United States newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer is rising by 1% each year. It is with sadness therefore, that I learned today that Teresa Heinz Kerry is now a part of that statistic.
Mrs. Heinz has been a long-standing advocate for research that better understands environmental and lifestyle causes of breast cancer. Teresa Heinz, as an action-oriented philanthropist and policy maker, is clearly a dear friend to all breast cancer prevention proponents.
But mammograms do not prevent breast cancer; so I reluctantly must disagree with Mrs. Heinz when she limits her remarks to say that all women, no matter what their risk levels, should have an annual mammogram at age 40 and older.
This one and only one- size- fits- all recommendation seems inappropriate, given recent research and experience on how high vitamin D levels can stop breast cancer from happening, as well as other known breast cancer risk factors, not to mention the well documented limits and sometimes dangers of annual screening mammograms.
To truly protect ourselves from developing breast cancer, all women, young and old, need to follow a real prevention lifestyle.. not just go running to get a mammogram!
For example:
- If you are past 40 have you found alternatives to contraceptive drugs or hormone replacement drugs ?
- Have you had a vitamin D3 blood test yet? Are you taking enough vitamin D3 supplements every day to keep your blood serum levels at 60 ng/ml?
- Are you filtering the water that you drink and shower with every day?
- Are you able to limit your alcohol intake to three glasses of wine or beer a week?
Research shows that no one habit or drug is going to cause breast cancer; instead breast cancer seems to happen when a mixture of such individualized risk factors comes together into a personalized toxic cocktail.
Each of us needs to understand this range of factors as we work to keep our own breast cancer risk level low.
Focusing only on getting an annual mammogram, instead of also encouraging women to seriously follow a real prevention lifestyle, will never lower the number of women who develop breast cancer.
To understand how you can put together your own real prevention lifestyle, see Know Breast Cancer’s 7 Easy Ways at www.knowbreastcancer.net
Wishing you peace and good health in your home, your community and across our world this holiday season,
Susan
Mammograms do not prevent breast cancer
Breast health centers, affiliated with medical centers around the U.S. are up in arms. Breast imaging radiologists are about to lose one third of their clients because a federal advisory panel just said that women, younger than 50, no longer have to appear each year for a screening mammogram.
Oncologists are also going to see a sharp drop in their actual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) business. These small, non cancerous, often calcified portions of a milk duct, only found through x-ray, are the predominant diagnosis among 40 to 50 year old women who have annual screening mammograms.
Considered to be “stage zero cancer” (stage zero means that you don’t have cancer), these irregular cells are still treated as though they are cancerous, with surgeons performing biopsies, lumpectomies, recommending radiation and estrogen-lowering drugs, and suggesting the idea of single or double mastectomies if patients want to avoid further treatment or eliminate any risks of developing invasive cancrs in the future. Foul ball!
At a national conference on DCIS this past September, experts agreed that we know next to nothing about this condition, except how to find it. The National Breast Cancer Coalition is recommending changing the term DCIS to “atypical hyperplasia,” in order to lower the fear factor that now strikes women when told they have a “ductal carcinoma in situ” or “stage zero breast cancer.” It is nice that honesty is about to see the light of day.
Meanwhile, until last week, the U.S. was the only nation in the world that encouraged women during their 40’s, without any high risk of developing breast cancer, to go near a mammography machine. Over the years, Canadian and European medical practitioners have watched us in disbelief, now they can at least lower their eyebrows.
Here is an email I received a few weeks ago from Paula, a 50 year old mother of two, diagnosed with DCIS after having an annual screening mammogram in 2007.
You may not remember me but I was one of those women who were at one of your first meetings who broke down in tears after having just learned we had breast cancer. …. I went on to research my diagnosis and options.
It turns out I had a very low grade slow growing in situ for which I had a lumpextory. I refused radiation and refused to take tamoxifen — much to the chagrin of my doctors. I am recurrence free after 2 years and continually fighting all the recommended MRI’s (toxic dye solutions) and most of those additional mammorgram they keep trying to give me. I am probably one of those over diagnosed and over treated women who are swelling the ranks of “breast cancer” survivors.
Now that women like Paula will be spared annual screening mammograms in their 40’s, those hospital- sponsored “breast health centers” , that have sprouted up around the country, stand to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenues, with significant layoffs, as a huge chunk of their youngest clients disappear.
May we can seize this moment and this empty office space as a time to turn the tide toward real breast cancer prevention. Maybe breast health centers can begin to staff up and offer real breast cancer prevention programs, instead of merely mammography, biopsy and lumpectory services. But what would a real breast health center program look like?
In my next post we will look at the kinds of program that real breast health centers can offer. These are programs that can work to limit the number of women who develop breast cancer; For a preview, see Know Breast Cancer’s 7 Easy Ways to help stop breast cancer from happening to you at www.knowbreastcancer.net
To read the full report on what we don’t know abou DCIS and what we need to know about DCIS, formally called.. National Institutes of Health State-of-The-Science Conference Statement - Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) September 22-24, 2009 consensus.nih.gov/2009/dcisstatement.htm
The Truth:Soy Prevents Breast Cancer
I know this is called Breast Cancer Awareness Month..so let’s be aware about the benefits of eating fermented soy a few times a week if you want to help prevent breast cancer.. or a recurrence of breast cancer.
Two recent landmark studies of Chinese women and one of Asian American women illustrated how women who eat fermented soy foods can decrease their risk of developing breast cancer by 59%. This is an astounding figure!!
Remember.. those who recommend you take a toxic drug to prevent breast cancer.. and warn you away from merely eating fermented organic soy.. are usually making money each time you purchase your monthly supply of these drugs.. or they receive million dollar grants from the drug companies who sell these breast cancer drugs.
Too many folks are interested in breast cancer awareness… for the big money they can make from unsuspecting patients.
So just ignore the scare tactics of the American Cancer Society and Susan G. Komen and other commercially- funded breast cancer organizations when it comes to eating soy. Remember that we are talking about fermented organic soy foods and this is solid research supporting adding fermented soy to your diet today.
Women who eat fermented organic soy products, such as miso soup and tempest stir drys, a number of times each week will find that they will not want to take those toxic drugs tamoxifen or arimidex.
Here are links to three recent articles on this subject I recently researched and wrote for my bi-weekly Honest Health Column, currently carried by the Gloucester (MA) Daily Times.
Please send your comments. Let’s get a good discussion going on this very important topic.
http://www.gloucestertimes.com/archivesearch/local_story_225222932.html
http://www.gloucestertimes.com/archivesearch/local_story_246224311.html
http://www.gloucestertimes.com/archivesearch/local_story_267224543.html
You can also read these articles at Know Breast Cancer”s website.. www.knowbreastcancer.net
Meanwhile .. take a look at Dr. Colin Campbell’s 2004 book, The China Study to learn why fermented soy is hands down better than popping tamoxifen et al. see www.thechinastudy.com
And if your bank account has a few extra $$$$ in it, take yourself to Canyon Ranch in Lenox, Massachusetts for a week or a weekend and learn how to keep your body’s estrogen levels nice and low.. by eating fermented soy, instead of popping an arimidex each day. www.canyonranch.com
Best Kept Secret: Cows’ Milk increases risk for breast cancer
May 25, 2009
\In my May 29th Honest Health column on the need to ban rBGH and other growth hormones from our food supply www.gloucestertimes.com I describe known links between drinking milk from cows treated with rBGH and eating meat and poultry containing added growth hormones with the increased risk of developing breast, prostate and other hormonal cancers.
What I don’t say is that cows milk by itself, is considered to be a major risk factor in breast and ovarian cancer. It appears that when individuals do not have the correct enzymes to metabolize many of the hormones naturally found in any type of cow’s milk., a glass of milk can flood the body with excess estrogen. This raises the risk of developing or accelerating the growth of existing breast cancer.
Jane Plant, a British geologist, describes saving her own life twenty years ago after facing metastatic breast cancer. An estrogen positive tumor, growing in her neck, disappeared in six weeks once Plant , currently a professor at the University of Nottingham, began a dairy-free lifestyle. She has continued to follow a dairy free lifestyle since that time and has remained cancer free to this day.
Plant’s book, The No-Dairy Breast Cancer Prevention Program, http://www.amazon.com/No-Dairy-Breast-Cancer-Prevention-Program/dp/0312291671
also published under the title, Your Life in Your Own Hands: Understanding. Preventing and Overcoming Breast Cancer, http://www.amazon.com/Your-Life-Hands-Understanding-Preventing/dp/0312275617 are both available from Amazon and other booksellers.
One possible reason most people have not read much about the connections between dairy products and an increased risk of breast cancer may be because the U.S. Dairy Lobby is formidable. The industry is able to maintain federal milk subsidies in spite of the fact that this policy artificially raises milk prices for U.S. consumers, tot the benefit of milk producers.
The Industry’s popular Got Milk? Campaign reflects a motherhood and apple pie feeling by including former federal cabinet members (Donna Shlala) , movie starts (Jennifer Aniston) and sport heroes. (Muhammad Ali). No wonder it is difficult to believe the research that shows how milk can increase breast cancer rates and accelerate breast cancer growth in a huge group of women.
See Andrew Weil’s comments on the strong links between dairy and hormonal cancers. http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA400175
For additional studies linking cows’ milk to breast cancer risk factors in humans, see:
http://milk.elehost.com/ www.notmilk.com www.milksucks.com; and www.sustainabletable.org
Arimidex & Atrazine: Money money money
February 9, 2009
Each month, the Collaborative on Health and the Environment or CHE, sponsors a conference call for members. As the director of Know Breast Cancer, I am able to stay up- to -date on new research that continues to link our high U.S. breast cancer rates to many things in our environment. Now it appears we really need to wonder what National Breast Cancer Awareness Month is all about when October rolls around again.
Dr Tyrone Hayes was the guest speaker on last month’s conference call. He had a few things to say about the pharmaceutical company Astra Zeneca, the original manufacturer of Tamoxifen; the same company that now brings us Arimidex. This is not a pretty story.
Astra Zeneca, the corporate founder, and editor of National Breast Cancer Awareness Month has no moral conscience.. just money on their minds.
Astra Zeneca co-owns Syngenta, the company that manufactures Atrazine. This popular pesticide acts as a chemical estrogen or aromatase enhancer, and pollutes rain water, rivers and produce across the United States. Many laboratory studies have shown that Atrazine, now banned in Europe, increases the risk of prostate, breast and ovarian cancers in lab animals and in humans.
Astra Zeneca also manufactures Arimidex, one of the aromatase inhibitor drugs, used to protect individuals against a recurrence of estrogen positive breast cancer. Arimidex works by blocking aromatase or future estrogen levels in the body.
This means that women who eat produce and grains and drink water tainted by Astra Zeneca’s Atrazine pesticide, increase their risk of developing breast cancer. But now women can also purchase Astra Zeneca’s Arimidex, to help them survive, once they actually develop estrogen positive breast cancer.
How do these corporate fathers and mothers of National Breast Cancer Awareness Month sleep at night come October, when it is time to bring out the pink ribbons?
Dr Tyrone Hayes, an award-winning tenured professor of biology at the University of California at Berkeley discovered Atrazine’s adverse hormonal effects on laboratory animals while working for Astra Zeneca as a research consultant. Hayes has now named Astra Zeneca a one-stop shopping experience. See his website www.atrazinelovers.com
Coming Next:
No More Big Squeeze: New Research Tells Women to Avoid Mammograms
-
Sign up for our Email Newsletter Stay informed of new developments in breast cancer prevention